Media Diet

It is very important today to find a media diet that works for you. I know many people who have on cable, either Fox or CNN or MSNBC, all day long. The stories are repeated from hour to hour, the hosts are snarky and emotional. They draw out the same topics all day long, which is on the surface is a mystery because there is so much news to share, but that is no longer their main focus. The best way to keep you watching is to hook you emotionally so they stay with the most upsetting stories. Don’t fall for it.

Break away from the cable addiction and get your news in a manner that won’t keep you up at night. The best way to get your news is from reliable websites using journalistic standards that use the least amount of sensationalism. That would be your local newspaper or programs such PBS or NPR. Even though all organizations have a level of bias it is possible to get the news without all the fanfare and fear.

I recommend getting your news at lunch. Don’t start the day with the news. Skim the headlines if you want to make sure WWIII hasn’t started, but don’t sink into the depths of despair. It’s not a great way to start the day.

It’s not a great way to end it either. Maybe watch the local news at 5, the national news at 6 but then switch to entertainment or turn it off all together and play Scrabble. You’ll find your heart rate go down, your breathing slow, you’ll get sleepier earlier and rest better throughout the night.

Vision

I have hope.

There is much despair and fear in our country. The media perpetuates the division in our country. Is it possible to watch the news and not be depressed? The media relies on clicks and viewership to maintain their bottom line and division is the best way to accomplish that goal. We are the victims of this situation. But we can be survivors if we have vision.

The vision of our future is to take back control of our thoughts and minds to imagine a world in which reasonable people can talk with one another about politics. I know, it seems impossible. We have all been led to believe it and trolls seem to make it true. But, I believe there are folks out there ready, willing and able to start a conversation.

Start with someone you know is close to your political stance. Talk with them about politics in general at first and get use to having a political chat. Next try getting into some specifics – what do they believe on a certain issue. Chances are good you both won’t have the same information or differ on facts or see the issue differently. That’s good! This is the beginning of a great conversation.

We need to realize that we don’t all agree exactly on any issue. This is where the Plaid in Political Plaid comes from. Each individual thread has something to offer. We weave a pattern together with all of our ideas.

We can practice on topics that don’t have a lot of disparity and find our way to common ground and potential solutions. Once we get good at this level, we can branch out to folks just out of our sphere of beliefs.

Envision a world where we can talk with one another. Imagine it and it can come true.

Cut programs or ???

The most common way folks consider balancing the American budget is to cut social programs. These programs are seen as something slackers take advantage of and hard-working tax payers don’t want their dollars being wasted on these bums. Where do social programs fail? Have you looked into the fraud rates?

According to the internet, “In 2021, the Department of Labor (DOL) estimated that there was about $8.5 billion in fraud in regular U(nemployment) I(nsurance) payments. The DOL’s Office of the Inspector General also flagged $45 billion in UI applications as potential fraud.” This is due to Identity theft and “claim hijacking”, other fake accounts and some employers may create false accounts to avoid tax liability. Some may continue to collect benefits they are no longer eligible. There are also scam websites. But the vast majority of this is not people sitting on the couch eating potato chips, the fraud comes from scammers and criminals abusing the system.

There is also huge fraud with the same kind of criminal activity in Medicare. Maybe the government needs to be bigger by employing fraud investigators to recover this lost money and prevent further loss. It would be money well spent.

https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2019/02/top-frauds-2018

We are so focused on cutting social programs we ignore the big elephant in the room. People are scared to mention it. You’ll be accused of being unAmerican. Of doubting your government putting your patriotism in question, but have you looked at the military budget lately?

Consider this – “Last year, the DOD failed its fifth audit and was unable to account for over half of its assets, which are in excess of $3.1 trillion, or roughly 78 percent of the entire federal government.

The DOD or Department of Defense is unable to account for $1.5+ trillion. That amount would fund all of these social programs – cash assistance, health insurance, food assistance, housing subsidies, energy and utilities subsidies, and education and childcare assistance – or, Medicare, – or Social Security.

Why can’t the DOD pass a budget audit? Who is in charge of holding the DOD accountable? We. Are.

Talk to your Congresspeople about fixing this loophole. We all want a strong, fierce military that protects us at home and in cyberspace. But the DOD must justify where this money is going. And only we can make sure that happens.

https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/markey-joins-sanders-grassley-in-bipartisan-push-to-audit-the-pentagon-and-end-wasteful-spending

Teaching or Indoctrinating?

I overheard a young man at a picnic talking fervently about politics to his friends. There was a young boy about three years old racing around and rolling in the grass. At one point, the young man grabbed the boy by the arm stopping him dead in his tracks, put his face an inch from his nose and loudly proclaimed, “Never trust the government, boy!” He repeated this a few more times and then let him go with a laugh.

If you ever wondered why we hold the beliefs of our families and communities, this is part of the reason why. Political beliefs are dearly held and passed along, or indoctrinated, into the next generation. What is the difference between teaching and indoctrinating, you ask? If a person is just giving their opinion, is that indoctrination?

The example at the beginning of this post is closer to indoctrination than not. It’s putting ideas in the mind of a child without any context or ability of the child to understand. It becomes a belief the child adopts without knowing why.

Teaching is where you explain your political beliefs and why you believe your ideas to be true. It’s done with a person who is developmentally ready to hear what you have to offer. If your beliefs can’t stand up to question and scrutiny, are they as strong as you think they are? Is it possible you were told to believe and do so without question?

How did you learn your political beliefs? How often do you challenge those beliefs by looking at ideas and facts from the “other side”? Can the government be trusted? Not at all ever? Sometimes? How do you decide? Since we must have a government, how would you keep the government in check? The Founders put in checks and balances with three arms of the government. Do you demand your Congresspeople keep those check and balances functioning?

Do you demand transparency? What would transparency look like from the government? How would the government balance national security with transparency?

If you have a belief the government cannot be trusted, be able to state why clearly with facts you can support. Come up with solutions on how to improve government reliability and reduce corruption. Talk with those who are mature enough to have the discussion and enact solutions.

Yelling at kids won’t solve the problem. Thoughtful action will.

What’s Your Problem, Anyway

What is your problem? Is it your problem? My problem? Their problem? Who is messing this country up? Republicans? Democrats? Third party candidates? Russia? What is the problem???

It’s very easy to make big, blanket statements about why we have seemingly unmovable problems in this country. It’s easy to say one candidate is better on an issue, immigration or global warming, than another but the most important thing is this –

The problem must be clearly defined and the answer is more than a quip or even a paragraph.

If someone you know says they vote for a candidate because they are better on the economy, ask them why they think so. Can they give a fairly detailed answer? Could you? If not, it isn’t possible to vote based on your current opinion.

There are some things that each candidate will be better or worse on concerning the economy. What you are looking for is their economic policy. What is the position and policies each candidate will implement to hold the economy (or any other issue) steady and stable? What are the values of each of the platforms? What do other reliable, informed sources have to say about the content of the platform, not just how the other guy is bad. How do they respond to criticisms made regarding their policies?

Where will you find reliable facts about the economy? Check the least biased news sources you can find. The one with the least advertisers is PBS or NPR. This news program also is the least sensational of all the sources. Even though New York Times and Wall Street Journal are mainstream both are fairly biased, but you can look for the facts in the article and practice ignoring the slant left or right.

By gathering this information, you’ll be an informed voter and then your vote counts.